WATER QUALITY
MANDATE FOR WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Government of India enacted the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 to maintain wholesomeness of aquatic resources. The act prescribes various functions for the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) at the apex level and State Pollution Control Boards at the state level.
The main functions of the Central Pollution Control Board are as follows:
* To advise the Central Government on any matter concerning restoration and maintaining the wholesomeness of aquatic resources and the prevention, control and abatement of water pollution.
* To plan and cause to be executed a nation-wide programme for the prevention, control and abatement of water pollution.
* To provide technical assistance and guidance to the State Pollution Control Board.
* To carry out and sponsor investigations and research related to prevention, control and abatement of water pollution.
* To collect, compile and publish technical and statistical data related to water pollution; and
* To lay down and annul standards for the quality of water in streams and wells.
The main functions of the State Pollution Control Boards are as follows:
* To plan a comprehensive programme for prevention, control and abatement of water pollution and to secure the execution thereof;
* To advise the State Government on any matter concerning prevention, control and abatement of water pollution.
* To collect and disseminate information related to water pollution.
* To collaborate with Central Pollution Control Board in programme related to prevention, control and abatement of water pollution; and
* To inspect air pollution control areas, assess quality of water and to take steps for prevention, control and abatement of water pollution in such areas.
To perform the above functions, CPCB needs continuous monitoring of water quality in the country. Keeping this fact in mind, CPCB has established a network of water quality monitoring.
The water quality monitoring is performed with following main objectives in mind:
* For rational planning of pollution control strategies and their prioritisation;
* To assess nature and extent of pollution control needed in different water bodies or their part;
* To evaluate effectiveness of pollution control measures already is existence;
* To evaluate water quality trend over a period of time;
* To assess assimilative capacity of a water body thereby reducing cost on pollution control;
* To understand the environmental fate of different pollutants.
* To assess the fitness of water for different uses.
MONITORING NETWORKS
The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has established a network of monitoring stations on aquatic resources across the country. The present network comprises of 4111 stations in 28 States and 8 Union Territories spread over the country. The monitoring network covers Rivers, Lakes, Tanks, Ponds, Creeks/Marine/Sea/Coastal, Canals, Drains, Ground water, STP and Water Treatment Plant (Raw Water). Water Body wise number of locations under NWMP is as follows:
Type of Water Body | No. of Monitoring Locations |
River | 2021 |
Lake | 341 |
Pond | 129 |
Tank | 138 |
Creek/Marine/Sea/Coastal | 63 |
Canal | 65 |
Drain | 60 |
Ground water | 1233 |
STP | 56 |
Water Treatment Plant ((Raw Water) | 5 |
Grand Total | 4111 |
STATE WISE STATIONS UNDER NWMP
State |
River |
Lake |
Pond |
Tank |
Canal |
Creek |
Drain |
Ground Water |
STP |
Water Treatment Plant (Raw Water) |
Grand Total |
ANDHRA PRADESH |
42 |
3 |
- |
1 |
6 |
11 |
4 |
33 |
1 |
- |
101 |
ARUNACHAL PRADESH |
29 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
29 |
ASSAM |
102 |
6 |
27 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
64 |
- |
- |
200 |
BIHAR |
96 |
3 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
70 |
- |
- |
171 |
CHANDIGARH |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
7 |
- |
- |
11 |
CHHATTISGARH |
29 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
- |
- |
39 |
DAMAN & DIU, DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI |
13 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
- |
- |
25 |
DELHI |
10 |
4 |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
9 |
45 |
6 |
- |
76 |
GOA |
32 |
9 |
- |
- |
3 |
11 |
- |
10 |
2 |
- |
67 |
GUJARAT |
67 |
20 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
- |
89 |
2 |
- |
187 |
HARYANA |
20 |
3 |
1 |
- |
14 |
- |
1 |
29 |
- |
3 |
71 |
HIMACHAL PRADESH |
142 |
5 |
23 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
49 |
- |
- |
219 |
JAMMU & KASHMIR |
64 |
36 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
23 |
- |
- |
124 |
JHARKHAND |
65 |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
76 |
KARNATAKA |
109 |
80 |
- |
95 |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
287 |
KERALA |
75 |
16 |
2 |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
34 |
1 |
- |
131 |
LAKSHADWEEP |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
42 |
- |
- |
45 |
MADHYA PRADESH |
158 |
22 |
12 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
54 |
- |
- |
247 |
MAHARASHTRA |
162 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
34 |
10 |
50 |
- |
- |
256 |
MANIPUR |
41 |
5 |
13 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
70 |
MEGHALAYA |
64 |
7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
84 |
MIZORAM |
46 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
26 |
- |
- |
76 |
NAGALAND |
17 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
29 |
ODISHA |
128 |
7 |
8 |
- |
9 |
4 |
4 |
90 |
3 |
- |
253 |
PUDUCHERRY |
6 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
22 |
- |
- |
31 |
PUNJAB |
61 |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
46 |
8 |
- |
130 |
RAJASTHAN |
35 |
17 |
1 |
- |
5 |
- |
- |
141 |
- |
- |
199 |
SIKKIM |
16 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
19 |
TAMIL NADU |
86 |
8 |
- |
1 |
5 |
- |
5 |
22 |
16 |
- |
143 |
TELANGANA |
55 |
50 |
13 |
37 |
- |
- |
13 |
45 |
11 |
- |
224 |
TRIPURA |
38 |
8 |
10 |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
57 |
- |
- |
120 |
UTTAR PRADESH |
115 |
2 |
2 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
40 |
- |
2 |
162 |
UTTARAKHAND |
39 |
2 |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
19 |
3 |
- |
67 |
WEST BENGAL |
59 |
13 |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
- |
68 |
- |
- |
142 |
Grand Total |
2021 |
341 |
129 |
138 |
65 |
63 |
60 |
1233 |
56 |
5 |
4111 |
POLLUTED RIVER STRETCHES
IDENTIFICATION OF POLLUTED RIVER STRETCHES
The water quality data under national water quality monitoring programme for the year 2016 and 2017 is analysed statistically and monitoring locations exceeding the water quality criteria are identified as polluted.
The polluted locations in a continuous sequence are defined as polluted river stretches and categorised in five priority classes based on BOD concentration exceeding to BOD levels >30 mg/l, BOD between 20&30 mg/l, BOD between 10&20mg/l, BOD between 6-10 mg/l and BOD between 3& 6 mg/l.
CRITERIA FOR PRIORITIZATION
The rivers have been prioritized based on the concentration of BOD in five classes from priority I to V. The criteria of each priority are elaborated indicating the concentration range of BOD in mg/l.
Criteria for Priority 1
- Monitoring locations exceeding BOD 30 mg/l has been considered as it is the standard for discharge of treated sewage from sewage treatment plants and general standard for effluent discharge from effluent treatment plants to rivers/streams it appears without dilution.(River locations having water quality exceeding discharge standards for BOD to fresh water sources)
- All monitoring locations exceeding BOD concentration 6 mg/l on all occasions.
- Monitoring locations exceeding 3 mg/l BOD are not meeting desired water quality criteria but does not affect to Dissolved Oxygen level in water bodies. If BOD exceeds 6mg/l in water body, the Dissolved Oxygen is reduced below desired levels.
- The raw water having BOD levels upto 5 mg/l are does not form complex chemicals on chlorination for municipal water supplies. Hence the water bodies having BOD more than 6 mg/l are considered as polluted and identified for remedial action.
Criteria for Priority 2
- Monitoring locations having BOD between 20-30 mg/l.
- All monitoring locations exceeding BOD concentration 6 mg/l on all occasions.
Criteria for Priority 3
- Monitoring locations having BOD between 10-20 mg/l.
- All monitoring locations exceeding BOD concentration 6 mg/l on all occasions.
Criteria for Priority 4
- Monitoring locations having BOD between 6-10 mg/l.
Criteria for Priority 5
- Monitoring locations having BOD between 3-6 mg/l.
- The locations exceeding desired water quality of 3mg/l BOD.
NUMBER OF STRETCHES- PRIORITY-WISE : The priority wise number of river stretches are given below:-
Priority |
Number of Stretches |
Priority 1 |
45 |
Priority 2 |
16 |
Priority 3 |
43 |
Priority 4 |
72 |
Priority 5 |
175 |
Total |
351 |
STATUS OF POLLUTED RIVER STRETCHES IN INDIA
The assessment of water quality for identification of Polluted River Stretches has found that there are 31 States and Union Territories having rivers and streams not meeting water quality criteria.
The state of Maharashtra has highest number of 53 polluted river stretches followed by the Assam, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Gujarat, Odisha, West Bengal, Karnataka Uttar Pradesh, Goa, Uttarakhand, Mizoram, Manipur, Jammu & Kashmir, Telangana, Meghalaya, Jharkhand, Himachal Pradesh, Tripura, Tamilnadu, Nagaland, Bihar, Chattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Sikkim, Punjab, Rajasthan, Puducherry, Haryana and Delhi.
Table : STATE-WISE NUMBERS OF POLLUTED RIVER STRETCHES IDENTIFIED IN YEAR 2018
State-wise number of Polluted River Stretches identified in Year 2018 |
|
Name of the State / UT |
Total No. of Identified Polluted River stretches (PRS) |
Andhra Pradesh | 5 |
Assam | 44 |
Bihar | 6 |
Chhattisgarh | 5 |
DD & DNH | 1 |
Delhi | 1 |
Goa | 11 |
Gujarat | 20 |
Haryana | 2 |
Himachal Pradesh | 7 |
J & K | 9 |
Jharkhand | 7 |
Karnataka | 17 |
Kerala | 21 |
Madhya Pradesh | 22 |
Maharashtra | 53 |
Manipur | 9 |
Meghalaya | 7 |
Mizoram | 9 |
Nagaland | 6 |
Odisha | 19 |
Puducherry | 2 |
Punjab | 4 |
Rajasthan | 2 |
Sikkim | 4 |
Tamil Nadu | 6 |
Telangana | 8 |
Tripura | 6 |
UP | 12 |
Uttarakhand | 9 |
West Bengal | 17 |
Grand Total | 351 |

PARAMETERS UNDER NATIONAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAMME

WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
Primary Water Quality Criteria for Bathing Waters click here
Designated Best Use Water Quality Criteria
Designated Best Use Water Quality Criteria |
||
Designated-best-Use/ Beneficial Use |
Classification of water |
Criteria |
Drinking water source without conventional treatment but after disinfection | A |
1. Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100 ml shall be 50 or less
2. pH between 6.5 and 8.5 3. Dissolved Oxygen 6 mg/l or more 4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20 °C 2 mg/l or less |
Outdoor bathing (organised) | B |
1. Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100 ml shall be 500 or less 2. pH between 6.5 and 8.5 3. Dissolved Oxygen 5 mg/l or more 4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20 °C 3 mg/l or less |
Drinking water source after conventional treatment and disinfection | C |
1. Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100 ml shall be 5000 or less 2. pH between 6 and 9 3. Dissolved Oxygen 4 mg/l or more 4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20 °C 3 mg/l or less |
Propagation of wild life and fisheries | D |
1. pH between 6.5 and 8.5 2. Dissolved Oxygen 4 mg/l or more 3. Free Ammonia (as N) 1.2 mg/l or less |
Irrigation, industrial cooling, controlled waste disposal | E |
1. pH between 6.0 and 8.5 2. Electrical Conductivity at 25 °C micro mhos/cm maximum 2250 3. Sodium absorption ratio maximum 26 4. Boron maximum 2 mg/l |
Water Quality Standards for Coastal Water Marine Outfalls click here
World Health Organization (WHO) GUIDELINES
WHO GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING WATER QUALITY
WHO produces international norms on water quality and human health in the form of guidelines that are used as the basis for regulation and standard setting, in developing and developed countries worldwide. The quality of drinking water is a powerful environmental determinant of health. Assurance of drinking water safety is a foundation for the prevention and control of waterborne diseases. The guidelines developed by WHO are prepared through a vast global consultative process involving WHO member states (India is the member state), national authorities and international agencies, in consultation with the WHO Expert Advisory Panel.
Parameters |
Standard limits as per WHO guidelines (mg/L) |
Acrylamide |
0.0005 |
Alachor |
0.02 |
Aldicarb |
0.01 |
Aldrin and Dieldrin |
0.00003 |
Ammonia |
1.5 |
Antimony |
0.02 |
Arsenic |
0.01 |
Atrazine |
0.002 |
Barium |
0.7 |
Benzene |
0.01 |
Benzo(α)pyrene |
0.0007 |
Boron |
0.5 |
Bromate |
0.01 |
Bromodichloromethane (BDCM) |
0.06 |
Bromoform |
0.1 |
Cadmium |
0.003 |
Carbofuran |
0.007 |
Carbon tetrachloride |
0.004 |
Chlorate |
0.7 |
Chlordane |
0.0002 |
Chloramines |
0.5 – 1.5 |
Chloride |
200 – 300 |
Chlorine |
5 |
Chlorite |
0.7 |
Chloroform |
0.3 |
Chlorotoluron |
0.03 |
Chlorpyrifos |
0.03 |
Chromium |
0.05 |
Colour in drinking water |
No visible colour |
Copper |
2.0 |
Cyanazine |
0.0006 |
Cyanide |
0.07 |
1,2-Dichlorobenzene |
1.0 |
1,4-Dichlorobenzene |
0.3 |
1,2-Dichloroethane |
0.03 |
Dichloromethane |
0.02 |
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid |
0.03 |
DDT and metabolites |
0.001 |
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate |
0.008 |
1,2-Dichloroethylene |
0.05 |
1,2-Dichloropropane |
0.04 |
Dimethonate |
0.006 |
1,4-Dioxane |
0.05 |
Dissolved oxygen |
No health-based guideline value is recommended |
Edetic acid (EDTA) |
0.6 |
Endrin |
0.0006 |
Epichlorohydrin |
0.0004 |
Ethylbenzene |
0.3 |
Fenoprop |
0.009 |
Fluoride |
1.5 |
Hexachlorobutadiene |
0.0006 |
Iron |
No health-based guideline value is proposed |
Isoproturon |
0.009 |
Lead |
0.01 |
Lindane |
0.002 |
Manganese |
0.4 |
Mercury |
0.006 |
Methoxychlor |
0.02 |
Metolachlor |
0.01 |
Microcystin-LR |
0.001 |
Molinate |
0.006 |
Molybdenum |
0.07 |
Monochloroacetate |
0.02 |
N-Nitrosodimethylamine |
0.0001 |
Nickel |
0.07 |
Nitrate |
50 |
Nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) |
0.2 |
Nitrite |
3 |
Pendimethalin |
0.02 |
Pentachlorophenol |
0.009 |
Permethrin |
0.3 |
pH |
No health-based guideline value is proposed |
Pyriproxyfen |
0.3 |
Selenium |
0.01 |
Simazine |
0.002 |
Sulphate |
No health-based guideline value has been derived |
Styrene |
0.02 |
Terbuthylazine |
0.007 |
Tetrachloroethylene |
0.04 |
Toluene |
0.7 |
Total dissolved solids (TDS) |
No health-based guideline value is proposed |
Trichloroacetate |
0.2 |
Trichloroethylene |
0.02 |
2,4,6,-Trichlorophenol |
0.2 |
Trifluralin |
0.02 |
Trutuim |
10000 Bq/L |
Uranium |
0.015 |
Vinyl chloride |
0.0003 |
Xylenes-total |
0.5 |
Zinc |
No health-based guideline value is proposed |
References:
Guidelines for drinking water quality, 4th edition, World Health Organization, 2011.
